Compensation advisory votes and broker non-vote anomalies.
Broker non-votes represent 30.8% of total shares in this election — above 12% anomaly threshold. High BNV indicates passive/retail share concentration; institutional engagement is below average.
Broker non-votes represent 12.2% of total shares in this election — above 12% anomaly threshold. High BNV indicates passive/retail share concentration; institutional engagement is below average.
Broker non-votes represent 17.9% of total shares in this election — above 12% anomaly threshold. High BNV indicates passive/retail share concentration; institutional engagement is below average.
Broker non-votes represent 19.9% of total shares in this election — above 12% anomaly threshold. High BNV indicates passive/retail share concentration; institutional engagement is below average.
Broker non-votes represent 15.0% of total shares in this election — above 12% anomaly threshold. High BNV indicates passive/retail share concentration; institutional engagement is below average.
Broker non-votes represent 14.3% of total shares in this election — above 12% anomaly threshold. High BNV indicates passive/retail share concentration; institutional engagement is below average.
Broker non-votes represent 12.5% of total shares in this election — above 12% anomaly threshold. High BNV indicates passive/retail share concentration; institutional engagement is below average.
Broker non-votes represent 15.0% of total shares in this election — above 12% anomaly threshold. High BNV indicates passive/retail share concentration; institutional engagement is below average.
Broker non-votes represent 14.2% of total shares in this election — above 12% anomaly threshold. High BNV indicates passive/retail share concentration; institutional engagement is below average.
Broker non-votes represent 13.3% of total shares in this election — above 12% anomaly threshold. High BNV indicates passive/retail share concentration; institutional engagement is below average.
Broker non-votes represent 34.1% of total shares in this election — above 12% anomaly threshold. High BNV indicates passive/retail share concentration; institutional engagement is below average.
Broker non-votes represent 31.5% of total shares in this election — above 12% anomaly threshold. High BNV indicates passive/retail share concentration; institutional engagement is below average.
Broker non-votes represent 25.2% of total shares in this election — above 12% anomaly threshold. High BNV indicates passive/retail share concentration; institutional engagement is below average.
Broker non-votes represent 24.5% of total shares in this election — above 12% anomaly threshold. High BNV indicates passive/retail share concentration; institutional engagement is below average.
Broker non-votes represent 15.9% of total shares in this election — above 12% anomaly threshold. High BNV indicates passive/retail share concentration; institutional engagement is below average.
Broker non-votes represent 15.5% of total shares in this election — above 12% anomaly threshold. High BNV indicates passive/retail share concentration; institutional engagement is below average.
Broker non-votes represent 15.5% of total shares in this election — above 12% anomaly threshold. High BNV indicates passive/retail share concentration; institutional engagement is below average.
Broker non-votes represent 16.5% of total shares in this election — above 12% anomaly threshold. High BNV indicates passive/retail share concentration; institutional engagement is below average.
Broker non-votes represent 17.2% of total shares in this election — above 12% anomaly threshold. High BNV indicates passive/retail share concentration; institutional engagement is below average.
Broker non-votes represent 19.3% of total shares in this election — above 12% anomaly threshold. High BNV indicates passive/retail share concentration; institutional engagement is below average.
Broker non-votes represent 19.2% of total shares in this election — above 12% anomaly threshold. High BNV indicates passive/retail share concentration; institutional engagement is below average.
Broker non-votes represent 21.4% of total shares in this election — above 12% anomaly threshold. High BNV indicates passive/retail share concentration; institutional engagement is below average.
Broker non-votes represent 21.8% of total shares in this election — above 12% anomaly threshold. High BNV indicates passive/retail share concentration; institutional engagement is below average.
Broker non-votes represent 23.1% of total shares in this election — above 12% anomaly threshold. High BNV indicates passive/retail share concentration; institutional engagement is below average.
Broker non-votes represent 27.1% of total shares in this election — above 12% anomaly threshold. High BNV indicates passive/retail share concentration; institutional engagement is below average.
Broker non-votes represent 26.6% of total shares in this election — above 12% anomaly threshold. High BNV indicates passive/retail share concentration; institutional engagement is below average.
Broker non-votes represent 24.5% of total shares in this election — above 12% anomaly threshold. High BNV indicates passive/retail share concentration; institutional engagement is below average.
Broker non-votes represent 22.4% of total shares in this election — above 12% anomaly threshold. High BNV indicates passive/retail share concentration; institutional engagement is below average.
Broker non-votes represent 18.0% of total shares in this election — above 12% anomaly threshold. High BNV indicates passive/retail share concentration; institutional engagement is below average.
Broker non-votes represent 13.9% of total shares in this election — above 12% anomaly threshold. High BNV indicates passive/retail share concentration; institutional engagement is below average.
Broker non-votes represent 17.4% of total shares in this election — above 12% anomaly threshold. High BNV indicates passive/retail share concentration; institutional engagement is below average.
Broker non-votes represent 16.8% of total shares in this election — above 12% anomaly threshold. High BNV indicates passive/retail share concentration; institutional engagement is below average.
Broker non-votes represent 34.1% of total shares — above 12% anomaly threshold.
Broker non-votes represent 34.1% of total shares — above 12% anomaly threshold.
Broker non-votes represent 34.1% of total shares — above 12% anomaly threshold.
Broker non-votes represent 34.1% of total shares — above 12% anomaly threshold.
Broker non-votes represent 34.1% of total shares — above 12% anomaly threshold.
Broker non-votes represent 34.1% of total shares — above 12% anomaly threshold.
Broker non-votes represent 34.1% of total shares — above 12% anomaly threshold.
Broker non-votes represent 34.1% of total shares — above 12% anomaly threshold.
Broker non-votes represent 34.1% of total shares — above 12% anomaly threshold.
Broker non-votes represent 15.4% of total shares in this election — above 12% anomaly threshold. High BNV indicates passive/retail share concentration; institutional engagement is below average.
Broker non-votes represent 12.4% of total shares in this election — above 12% anomaly threshold. High BNV indicates passive/retail share concentration; institutional engagement is below average.
Broker non-votes represent 17.2% of total shares in this election — above 12% anomaly threshold. High BNV indicates passive/retail share concentration; institutional engagement is below average.